To help the NMSDC network better understand the ruling of
the Federal District Court in Texas on the Minority Business Development Agency
(MBDA) and some of its implications, we invited three distinguished experts to
join NMSDC CEO and President Ying McGuire in dialogue:
Alphonso David, president and CEO, Global Black
Economic Forum.
Damon Hewitt, president and executive director,
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
Sarah Von Der Lippe, pro bono counsel, Minority
Business Enterprise Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.
NMSDC opened the panel by reiterating its strong commitment
to support the MBDA and the critical business and supplier diversity efforts
that are key to growing minority business enterprises (MBEs). After a brief
introduction, the panelists discussed the recent court ruling and its
ramifications for NMSDC and its network of partners. Important highlights
include:
The court acknowledged that minority-owned businesses face
discrimination in both credit markets and federal contracting, however, the
court eliminated remedies for this discrimination.
This decision only applies to one federal agency and one
federal statute. It does not apply to
local, state, and other federal programs nor does it affect private sector
supplier and business diversity programs.
The experts on the panel then provided much-needed framing
and context of the ruling and the current legal environment including:
This case is part of a continued pattern of litigation aimed
at undermining government efforts focused on removing barriers for minority
businesses, explaining that attacks on these programs have been going on for
over 45 years, in many cases since the programs were first launched. The attacks are not only focused on
explicitly race-conscious programs but also target race-neutral programs such
as the SBA 8(a) program.
The attacks are part of a larger effort to strip
marginalized communities of all the protections of law and it is important to
focus on the interconnected nature of attacks on voting rights, reproductive
rights, minority business programs, and other related issues.
These programs work and the attacks represent a cynical
effort to undo the recent progress minority businesses have experienced.
The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, which was
intended to protect Black communities in the wake of slavery and Civil War
Reconstruction, is now being used to disenfranchise.
Historically, government efforts to combat discrimination
have had broad bipartisan and public support — something that is still the case
today.
The current challenges are part of a highly coordinated
effort that has been years in the making and is being primarily led by a small
group of well-funded, well-connected, and highly coordinated organizations.
The webinar also highlighted some next steps for pushing
back against these attacks:
Corporations should use this moment as an opportunity to
double down on voluntary supplier and business diversity activities. The ruling
does not apply to these types of programs and is an opportunity for the private
sector to take the lead in minority business development.
MBEs should contribute to evidence-building by coming
forward to document their experiences of discrimination and their resilience
despite those barriers.
The importance of participating in and supporting funding
for local and state disparity studies.
The panel concluded with NMSDC CEO and President Ying
McGuire passionately calling on the network to come together to support the
MBDA, their regional centers, MBEs, corporate members, and all those working to
battle discrimination and help grow minority businesses.